Nanotechnology: A focus on Treatment of Tuberculosis

Authors

  • Nitish kumar SLT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas vishwavidyalaya, Koni, bilaspur-4950009 (C.G), India
  • Peeyush kumar SLT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas vishwavidyalaya, Koni, bilaspur-4950009 (C.G), India
  • Pramod kumar SLT Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas vishwavidyalaya, Koni, bilaspur-4950009 (C.G), India
  • Mithilesh kumar Depatment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032, (West Bengal), India
  • Rajeev kumar Depatment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032, (West Bengal), India

Keywords:

Tuberculosis, Nanotechnology, liposome, Polymeric nanoparticle, non-polymeric nanoparticle

Abstract

Despite the fact that we live in an era of advanced technology and innovation, infectious diseases, like Tuberculosis (TB), continue to be one of the greatest health challenges worldwide. The main drawbacks of conventional TB treatment are the development of multiple drug resistance, resulting in high dose requirements and subsequent intolerable toxicity. Therefore there is a need of a new system have been receiving special attention with the aim of minimizing the side effects of drug therapy, such as poor bioavailability and the selectivity of drugs. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have considerable potential for treatment of TB. The important technological advantages of nanoparticles used as drug carriers are high stability, high carrier capacity, feasibility of incorporation of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances, and feasibility of variable routes of administration, including oral application and inhalation. Nanoparticles can also be designed to allow controlled (sustained) drug release from the matrix. These properties of nanoparticles enable improvement of drug bioavailability and reduction of the dosing frequency, and may resolve the problem of nonadherence to prescribed therapy, which is one of the major obstacles in the control of TB epidemics. In this review, we discuss the challenges with the current treatment of the disease and shed light on the remarkable potential of nanotechnology to provide more effective treatment and prevention for TB.

References

Kumar Vinay, Abbas AK, Fausto N,

Mitchell RN. Robbins Basic Pathology

,Saunder Elsevier. 2007;8:516–522.

Tuberculosis. The International Union

against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

(The Union).

http://www.theunion.org/tuberculosis/tuber

culosis.html (accessed February 2008).

Frieden TR, Sterling TR, Munsiff SS, Watt

CJ, Dye C. Tuberculosis (Seminar), Lancet

;362:887–899.

Konstantinos A. "Testing for tuberculosis".

Australian Prescriber, 2010;33:12-18.

Jasmer RM, Nahid P, Hopewell PC

"Clinical practice. Latent tuberculosis

infection".N. Engl. J.

Med.2002;347(23):1860–1866.

"Tuberculosis". World Health Organization.

Retrieved 12 November 2009. Fact

sheet No 104.

World Health Organization

"Epidemiology". Global tuberculosis

control: epidemiology, strategy,

financing.2009:6–33.

Dannenberg AM, Jr. Immunopathogenesis

of pulmonary tuberculosis. Hosp Pract

;28:51–58.

Daniel TM, Bates JH, Downes KA. History

of tuberculosis. In: Bloom BR, editor.

Tuberculosis:Pathogenesis, protection and

control. Washington, DC: ASM Press;

,13–24.

Nardell E. Pathogenesis of tuberculosis. In:

Reichman LB, Herschfield E, editor. Lung

biology in health and disease. New York:

Marcel Dekker, Inc.1993,103–123.

Schmitt E, Meuret G, Stix L. Monocyte

recruitment in tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.

Br J Haematol 1977;35:11–17.

Spencer H. Pathology of the lung, 4th

edition. Vol 1. Oxford: Pergmon Press;

Youmans GP. Tuberculosis. Philadelphia:

The WB Saunders Co; 1979.

Hopewell PC. Overview of clinical

tuberculosis. In: Bloom BR, editor.

Tuberculosis: Pathogenesis, protection and

control. Washington, DC: ASM Press;

pp 25–46.

Yang Z, Kong Y, Wilson F, Foxman B,

Fowler AH, Marrs CF, Cave MD, Bates JH.

Identification of risk factors for

extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Clin Infect

Dis 2004;15, 38(2):199–205.

Gonzalez OY, Adams G, Teeter LD, Bui

TT, Musser JM, Graviss EA. Extrapulmonary manifestations in a large

metropolitan area with a low incidence of

tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis

;7(12):1178–1185.

History of TB. An interesting timeline

available on

http://www.indiachestsociety.org/tb/

timeline.asp/.

Deivanayagam CN. Tuberculosis in the

twenty-first century: The Indian response. J

Indian Med Assoc 2003;101(3):139.

Gandy M, Zumla A. The resurgence of

disease: social and historical perspectives

on the ‘new’ tuberculosis. Soc Sci Med

;55(3):385–401.

Ramachandran R, Balasubramanian R,

Muniyandi M. Socio–economic impact of

TB on patients and families in India. Int J

Tuberc Lung Dis 1999;3:869–877.

Mahadev B, Kumar P. History of

tuberculosis control in Ind. J Indian Med

Assoc 2003;101(3):142–143.

Mitchison DA. Fluoroquinolones in the

treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit

Care Med 2004;169:334–335.

Fox W, Sutherland I. A five-year

assessment of patients in a controlled trial

of streptomycin, para-aminosalicylic acid

and streptomycin and para-aminosalicylic

acid. Q J Med 1956;98:221–243.

McDermott W. Antimicrobial therapy of

pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull World Health

Organ 1960;23:427–461.

Hong Kong Chest Service/British Medical

Research Council. Controlled trial of 2, 4

and 6 months of pyrazinamide, in threetimesweekly regimens for smear-positive

pulmonary tuberculosis, including an

assessment of a combined preparation of

isoniazid, rifampin and pyrazinamide. Am

Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:700–706.

World Health Organization. Guidance for

national tuberculosis programmes on the

management of tuberculosis in children.

WHO/HTM/TB/ 2006. 371. Geneva: World

Health Organization, 2006.

Farokhzad OC, Langer R., Impact of

nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS

Nano. 3(1), 2009,16–20.

Godreuil S, Tazi L, Bañuls AL.

Encyclopedia of infectious diseases:

modern methodologies, in: M. Tibayrenc

(Ed.), Pulmonary Tuberculosis and

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Modern

Molecular Epidemiology and Perspectives,

John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2007,1–30.

Aaron L, Saadoun D, Calatroni I, Launay

O, Mémain N, Vincent V et al.

Tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients: a

comprehensive review, Clin. Microbiol.

Infect. 2004;10:388–398.

Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kunst H, Gibson A,

Cummins E, Waugh N et al. A systematic

review of rapid diagnostic tests for the

detection of tuberculosis infection, Health.

Technol. Assess. 2007;11:1–178.

Al-Orainey I. Diagnosis of latent

tuberculosis: can we do better? Ann.

Thorac. Med. 2009;4: 5–9.

Bosman AW, Janssen HM, Meijer EW.

About dendrimers: structure, physical

properties, and applications. Chem Rev

;99:1665–88.

Kumar PV, Asthana A, Dutta T, Jain NK.

Intracellular macrophage uptake of

rifampicin loaded mannosylated

dendrimers, J. Drug Target. 2006;14:546–

Kumar PV, Agashe H, Dutta T, Jain NK.

PEGylated dendritic architecture for

development of a prolonged drug delivery

system of an antitubercular drug, Curr.

Drug Deliv. 2007;4:11–19.

Pitha J, Milecki J, Fales H, Pannell L,

Uekama K. Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin:

preparation and characterization; effects on

solubility of drugs, International Journal of

Pharmaceutics. 1986;29(1):73-82.

Ferreira DA, Ferreira AG, Vizzotto L,

Federman AN, Gomes A. Analysis of the

molecular association of rifampicin with

hydroxypropyl-β- cyclodextrin, Braz. J.

Pharm. Sci. 2004;1:43–51.

Koester LS, Guterres SS, Roch ML, EiflerLima ML, Zuanazzi JA , Bassani VL.

Ofloxacin/β-Cyclodextrin Complexation,

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

; 27(6):533-540.

Prakash BR,Suresh S, Narendra C.

Balasangameshwer, Physicochemical

characterization of β-cyclodextrin and

hydroxy ethyl β-cyclodextrin complexes of

rifampicina, Ars Pharm. 2006;47:37–59.

Lindenberg M, Kopp S, Dressman JB.

Classification of orally administered drug

on the World Health Organization model

list of essential medicines according to the

Biopharmaceutics Classification System,

Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2004;58:265–278.

Lenaerts AJ, Gruppo V, Marietta KS,

Johnson CM, Driscoll DK, Tompkins NM.

Preclinical testing of the nitroimidazopyran

PA-824 for activity against Mycobacterium

tuberculosis in a series of in vitro and in

vivo models, Antimicrob. Agents

Chemother. 2005;49: 2294–2301.

Evrard B, Bertholet P, Gueders M, Flament

MP, Piel G, Delattre L.Cyclodextrins as a

potential carrier in drug nebulization, J.

Control. Release 2004;96:403–410.

Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block

copolymer micelles for drug delivery:

design, characterization and biological

significance, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

;47:113–131.

Croy SR, Kwon GS. Polymeric micelles for

drug delivery, Curr. Pharm. Des.

;12:4669–4684.

Chiappetta DA, Sosnik A. Poly(ethylene

oxide)–poly(propylene oxide) block

copolymer micelles as drug delivery agents:

Improved hydrosolubility, stability and

bioavailability of drugs, Eur. J. Pharm.

Biopharm. 2007;66:303–317.

Moretton MA, Glisoni RJ, Chiappetta DA,

Sosnik A. Synthesis and characterization of

amphiphilic poly/epsilon-caprolactone)-

poly (ethyleneglycol) block copolymers.

Silva M, Ricelli NL, El OS, Valentim CS,

Ferreira AG, Sato DN.Potential

tuberculostatic agent: micelle-forming

pyrazinamide prodrug, Arch. Pharm. Chem.

Life Sci. 2006;339:283–290.

Silva M, Ferreira EI, Leite CQF, Sato DN.

Preparation of polymeric micelles for use as

carriers of tuberculostatic drugs, Trop. J.

Pharm. Res.2007;6:815–824.

Jin Y, Chen S, Xin R, Zhou Y. Monolayers

of the lipid derivatives of isoniazid atbthe

air/water interface and the formation of

self-assembled nanostructures in water,

Colloids Surf., B Biointerfaces

;64:229–235.

Soppimath KS, Aminabhavi TM, Kulkarni

AR, Rudzinski WE. Biodegradable

polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery

devices, J. Control. Release 2001;70:1–20.

Delie F, Blanco-Prieto MJ. Polymeric

particulates to improve oral bioavailability

of peptide drugs, Molecules 2005;10:65–80.

Brannon-Peppas L. Recent advances on the

use of biodegradable microparticles and

nanoparticles in controlled drug delivery,

Int. J. Pharm.1995;116:1–9.

Owens TE , Peppas NA. Opsonization,

biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of

polymeric nanoparticles, Int. J. Pharm.

;307:93–102.

Anisimova YV, Gelperina SI, Peloquin

CA, Heifets LB. Nanoparticles as

antituberculosis drugs carriers: effect on

activity against My cobacterium

tuberculosis in human monocyte-derived

macrophages, J. Nanopart. Res. 2000;

:165–171.

Kisich KO, Gelperina SI, Higgins MP,

Wilson S, Shipulo E, Oganesyan E.

Encapsulation of moxifloxacin within

poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles

enhances efficacy against intracellular

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Int. J. Pharm.

;345:154–162.

Shipulo EV, Lyubimov II, Maksimenko

OO, Vanchugova LV, Oganesyan EA,

Sveshnikov PG. Development of a

nanosomal formulation of moxifloxacin

based on poly (butyl-2-cyanoacrylate),

Pharm. Chem. J. 2008;42:145–149.

Pandey R, Zahoor A, Sharma S, Khuller

GK. Nanoparticle encapsulated

antitubercular drugs as a potential oral drug

delivery system against murine

tuberculosis, Tuberculosis 2003;83:373–

Zahoor A, Pandey R, Sharma S, Khuller

GK. Pharmacokinetic and

pharmacodynamic behavior of

antitubercular drugs encapsulated in

alginate nanoparticles at two doses, Int. J.

Antimicrob. Agents 2006;27:409–416.

Gregoriadis G, Wills EJ, Swain CP, Tavill

AS. Drug carrier potential of liposomes in

cancer chemotherapy, Lancet 1974;1:1313–

Klemens SP, Cynamon MH, Swenson CE,

Ginsberg RS. Liposome-encapsulatedgentamicin therapy of Mycobacterium

avium complex infection in beige mice,

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

;34:967–970.

Leitzke S, Bucke W, Borner K, Muller R,

Hahn H, Ehlers S. Rationale for and

efficacy of prolonged-interval treatment

using liposome-encapsulated amikacin in

experimental Mycobacterium avium

infection, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

;42: 459–461.

Oh YK, Nix DE, Straubinger RM.

Formulation and efficacy of

liposomeencapsulated antibiotics for

therapy of intracellular Mycobacterium

avium infection, Antimicrob. Agents

Chemother. 1995;39:2104–2111.

Duzgunes N, Flasher D, Reddy MV, LunaHerrera J, Gangadharam PR. Treatment of

intracellular Mycobacterium avium

complex infection by free and

liposomeencapsulated sparfloxacin,

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

;40:2618–2621.

Deol P, Khuller GK. Lung specific

liposomes: stability, biodistribution and

toxicity of liposomal antitubercular drugs in

mice, Biochem. Biophys. Acta

;1334:161–172.

Deol P, Khuller GK, Joshi K. Therapeutic

efficacies of isoniazid and rifampin

encapsulated in lung-specific stealth

liposomes against Mycobacterium

tuberculosis infection induced in mice,

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

;41:1211–1214.

Mehta RT, Keyhani A, McQueen TJ,

Rosenbaum B, Rolston KV, Tarrand JJ. In

vitro activities of free and liposomal drugs

against Mycobacterium avium– M.

intracellulare complex and Mycobacterium

tuberculosis, Antimicrob. Agents

Chemother. 1999;37:2584–2587.

Adams LB, Sinha I, Franzblau SG,

Krahenbuhl LJ, Mehta RT. Effective

treatment of acute and chronic murine

tuberculosis with liposome-encapsulated

clofazimine, Antimicrob. Agents

Chemother. 1999;43:1638–1643.

Downloads

Published

2011-03-31

How to Cite

Nitish kumar, Peeyush kumar, Pramod kumar, Mithilesh kumar, & Rajeev kumar. (2011). Nanotechnology: A focus on Treatment of Tuberculosis. International Journal of Drug Delivery, 3(1), 25–42. Retrieved from https://ijdd.arjournals.org/index.php/ijdd/article/view/52

Issue

Section

Review Article