Development, intra-gastric performance and pharmacokinetic study of gastroretentive drug delivery system for cefdinir in human volunteers

Authors

  • Ramesh Bomma Department of Pharmaceutics, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal-506 009, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA.
  • Kishan Veerabrahma Department of Pharmaceutics, University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal-506 009, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA

Keywords:

Cefdinir, Gastroretentive floating tablets, Polyethylene oxide, Radiographic imaging, Pharmacokinetic study

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop sustained-release floating tablets of cefdinir (CFDN) using effervescent technique to prolong gastric residence time (GRT) and compare their pharmacokinetics with immediate release (IR) and conventional sustained release (SR) tablets. The tablets were designed using CaCO3 as gas-former and three grades of polyethylene oxide as release-retardants and further were evaluated for their physical characters, in vitro drug release and buoyancy studies. The optimized formulation (F3) was found to be physically stable when stored at 40 oC/75% RH for 3 months. In vivo radiographic imaging of F3 revealed a mean GRT of 4.83 μ 0.57 h (n=3). Comparative pharmacokinetic study was performed for F3, IR and SR tablets of CFDN in humans. Based on in vivo performance, the difference between tmax, AUC0-¥, t1/2 and MRT of F3, IR and SR tablets were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). The difference between Cmax of F3 and IR tablet was statistically significant, but the Cmax of F3 and SR tablet was not statistically significant. The relative bioavailability of F3 was 1.71 fold to IR and 1.24 fold to SR. This improved bioavailability is due to the combined effect of sustained release and increased GRT.

References

. Chien YW. Oral drug delivery systems.

In: novel drug delivery systems, Chien

YW, editor. Marcel Dekker, New York,

; p. 139ă196.

. Ritschel WA, Kearns GL.

Absorption/Transport Mechanisms. In:

Handbook of basic pharmacokinetics

including clinical applications, Ritschel

WA, Kearns GL, editors. American

Pharmaceutical Association,

Washington DC, 1999; p. 63.

. Cremer K. Drug delivery: Gastroremaining dosage forms. Pharm. J.

; 259: 108.

. Brahma NS, Know HK. Floating drug

delivery systems: an approach to oral

controlled drug delivery via gastric

retention. J. Control. Release 2000;

(1-2): 235ă259.

. Garg R, Gupta GD. Progress in

controlled gastroretentive delivery

systems. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2008; 7

(3): 1055ă1066.

. Xiaoqiang X, Minjie S, Feng Z, Yiqiao

H. Floating matrix dosage form for

phenoporlamine hydrochloride based

on gas forming agent: in vitro and in

vivo evaluation in healthy volunteers.

Int. J. Pharm. 2006; 310: 139ă145.

. Deshpande AA, Shah NH, Rhodes CT,

Malick W. Development of a novel

controlled release system for gastric

retention. Pharm. Res. 1997; 14: 815ă

. Chavanpatil MD, Jain P, Chaudhari S,

Shear R, Vavia RR. Novel sustained

release, swellable and bioadhesive

gastroretentive drug delivery system for

ofloxacin. Int. J. Pharm. 2006; 316 (1ă

: 86ă92.

. Hwang SJ, Park H, Park K. Gastric

retentive drug-delivery systems. Crit.

Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 1998; 15

(3): 243ă284.

. Seth PR, Tossounian J. The

hydrodynamically balanced system, a

novel drug delivery system for oral use.

Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1984; 10: 313ă

. Harrigan RM. Drug delivery device for

preventing contact of undissolved drug

with the stomach lining. US Patent

October 25, 1977; 4055178.

. Whitehead L, Fell JT, Collett JH.

Development of a gastroretentive

dosage form. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996;

(Suppl): S182.

. Kawashima Y, Niwa T, Takeuchi H,

Hino T, Itoh, Y. Hollow microspheres

for use as a floating controlled drug

delivery system in the stomach. J.

Pharm. Sci. 1992; 81: 135ă140.

. Chen J, Blevins WE, Park H, Park K.

Gastric retention properties of

superporous hydrogel composites.

J.Control. Release 2000; 64 (1-3): 39ă

. Gröning R, Berntgen M, Georgarakis

M. Acyclovir serum concentrations

following peroral administration of

magnetic depot tablets and the

influence of extracorporal magnets to

control gastrointestinal transit. Eur. J.

Pharm. Biopharm. 1998; 46 (3): 285ă

. Perry CMS, Lesley J. Cefdinir: a review

of its use in the management of mildto-moderate bacterial infections. Drugs

; 64: 1433ă1464.

. Julie LC. PhysiciansÊ Desk Reference,

th ed. PDR Network, Montvale, 2011;

p. 1298-3000.

. Ramesh B, Kishan V. Development of

gastroretentive drug delivery system for

cefuroxime axetil: in vitro and in vivo

evaluation in human volunteers.

Pharm. Dev. Tech. 2012; Early online,

-8. DOI:

3109/10837450.2012.660698.

. Chen GL, Hao WH. In vitro

performance of floating sustained

release capsule of verapamil. Drug.

Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1998; 24: 1067-1072.

. Wagner JG. Interpretation of percent

dissolved-time plots derived from in

vitro testing of conventional tablets and

capsules. J. Pharm. Sci. 1969; 58:

-1257.

. Higuchi T. Mechanism of sustainedaction medication: theoretical analysis

of rate of release of solid drugs

dispersed in solid matrices. J. Pharm.

Sci. 1963; 52: 1145-1149.

. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E,

Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of

solute release from porous hydrophilic

polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 1983; 15: 25-

. Ritger PL, Peppas NA. A simple

equation for description of solute

release II. Fickian and anomalous

release from swellable devices. J.

Control. Release 1987; 5: 37ă42.

. Mathews BR. Regulatory aspects of

stability testing in Europe. Drug Dev.

Ind. Pharm. 1999; 25: 831ă856.

. Tadros MI. Controlled-release

effervescent floating matrix tablets of

ciprofloxacin hydrochloride:

Development, optimization and in vitroă

in vivo evaluation in healthy human

volunteers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

; 74: 332ă339.

. Swati CJ, Amit JA, Sudhir VP,

Bhanudas SK, Aniruddha RC.

Formulation and evaluation of

gastroretentive drug delivery system of

propranolol hydrochloride. AAPS

Pharm. Sci.Tech. 2009; 10 (3): 1071-

. Safaa SEG, Viviane FN, Ahmed NA.

Optimization of acyclovir oral tablets

based on gastroretention technology:

Factorial design analysis and

physicochemical characterization

studies. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2011;

(7): 855ă867.

. Zhang CL, Jiao JJ, Wu YN, Song JQ,

Gao WZ, Ma DL, Lou JS. Study on

pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence

of cefdinir dispersible tablet in healthy

chinese volunteers. J. Bioequiv.

Availab. 2011; 3(6): 114-117.

. Shargel L, Pong SW, Yu ABC. Applied

biopharmaceutics and

pharmacokinetics 5th ed. Mc Graw Hill,

New York, 2005; p. 435-475&169-176.

. Banker GS, Anderson NR. Tablets. In:

Lachmann L, Liberman HA, Kaing JL,

editors. The theory and practice of

industrial pharmacy, 3rd ed. Varghese

publishing house, Mumbai, 1987; p.

-299.

. Chiao CSL, Robinson JR. Sustainedrelease Drug Delivery Systems. In:

Gennaro AR, editor. Remington: The

Science and Practice of Pharmacy,

th ed. Vol. 2, Lippincott, Williams and

Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000; p.1660ă

. Cheong LLWS, Heng PWS, Wong LF.

Relationship between polymer viscosity

and drug release from a matrix system.

Pharm. Res. 1992; 9(11): 1510-1514..

Downloads

Published

2013-03-31

How to Cite

Ramesh Bomma, & Kishan Veerabrahma. (2013). Development, intra-gastric performance and pharmacokinetic study of gastroretentive drug delivery system for cefdinir in human volunteers. International Journal of Drug Delivery, 5(1), 63–72. Retrieved from https://ijdd.arjournals.org/index.php/ijdd/article/view/182

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles